вторник, 20 августа 2013 г.

Studying Modern Literarure

Some people think that at school students do not study enough
modern authors and modern literature.

   No doubt that modern literature has become very popular nowadays.
More and more people buy a huge variety of books written by modern
authors. Nevertheless, some people are sure that students do not
spend enough time on studying it.
   In my view, classical literature is much more important for students.
First of all, it is a good way of mental stimulation. It forces people to
think about the highest values and qualities. Secondly, it helps people
to become well-rounded and more intelligent. What is more, if a person
 studies novels written by Tolstoy, Chekhov or Shakespeare he will
 probably know the history and culture of countries where these authors
 lived.
   However, some people think that modern literature is rarely studied 
at school. They also think that it is more important to read books of 
modern authors as it is usually much more interesting and enjoyable.
   I cannot agree with them. To my mind, reading classical books can 
give great pleasure to its readers. Modern books have only an interesting 
content while classical literature shows spiritual values and changes 
people's life.
   In conclusion, I am convinced that students should not study modern
literature a lot at schools. Knowing classical ones can be much more 
important and significant.

пятница, 7 июня 2013 г.

Parents VS Computer

Some people think that if there is a computer at home their
children will waste much of their time on video games and social
networking.


    In modern world a computer plays an significant role for a person.
More and more people use it for a variety of reasons. Some people
consider that the computer has negative effects on children who only
play computer games. But other believe that a child needs the
computer.
    In my opinion, the computer is an extremely useful gadget for
children. Firstly, the computer helps pupils with the studying. They
can get necessary information and more knowledge. Secondly, when
the child has the computer and the access to the Internet, he can
converse with people around the world, even who are in another part
of the world. And it helps the child to develop his social skills.
   On the other hand, there are those who assume that the using of a
computer is very useless, even harmful to children. Sometimes
teenagers fall under the computer addiction.
   I disagree with this point, because this situation happens because of
paying no parents attention. Teenagers spend much time playing
video games because of being alone.
   In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that the using of a computer is
necessary for the child in the information society. I hope that computer 
will continue to act as the useful gadget and will not replace friends and 
relatives.


True Friends

Some people think that you can have only one true friend.


     Friendship is one of the most important part in everyone`s life.
Regarding this some people assume that a person can have only one
genuine friend. But others believe that friendship can be between 
several friends.
    To my way of thinking, there can be one true friend. Firstly, one is
always close with you, one is at your side in joy and in sorrow. Such
a devoted friend never betrays you. Secondly, having many friends, a
person does not have chance to devote time equally for all them.
There will be one who you spend more time with. In addition, a man
can not trust and reveal all his secrets every close friends, because
somebody is more significant for him, somebody is less. 
    On the other hand, there are those who think that people can have 
more than one true friend. If you have multiple friends, you always 
will be able to obtain assistance and support. 
    I partly agree with this point of view, as it is probably you will be
supported by only best friend in the bad times, but other 'true' friends
will turn their back on you. 
    In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that a person can have only 
one genuine friend who cherish you unconditionally.


понедельник, 3 июня 2013 г.

Money vs Happiness

Money can/ cannot buy happiness.


     It is fairly safe to assert that money is an integral part of our life and
hardly anyone can survive without it. However, it is not always true
that a lump sum of money brings much joy to its owner. Although,
some people believe that being rich is a pure definition of happiness.
     Personally, I am inclined to believe that a person has more important
values in their lives than money. Firstly, being healthy is already
enough to be happy. One can be filthy rich, but he is bound to feel
miserable if he is incurably sick. Secondly, a loyal family and
supportive friends are another important aspect of our life. Under no
circumstances is it possible to buy love and respect a family can offer
to its members.
     Nevertheless, people who are prone to believe that money does bring
plenty of satisfaction name some exceptional opportunities wealthy
people have. Expensive houses and cars, the possibility to travel to
any distination in the world, quality education and health service are
among the most desirable things that can be obtained in exchange for
money.
    Even though they may be partly right, it is important not to forget that
money is helpless when it comes to people’s relationships. Nobody
can be called a happy person if there is noone who sincerely love and
support them.
    In conclusion, I maintain that money plays crucial role in making a
person feel secure and content. But few people would deny that only
good health and sincere relationship enable us to be totally satisfied 
with our lives.


Pocket Money

Some people think parents should/ should not give money to their children.


     Many parents consider giving a weekly allowance to their children 
normal practice. However there is an opinion that children are not 
mature enough to deal with money and this will only spoil them. Who 
is right? 
     I am of the opinion that youngsters should have some sum of money 
for their own spending. First of all, it would be irresponsible of parents 
if they did not provide money for such essential expanses such as lunch 
at school or transportation fees. Moreover, children are likely to feel 
more confident if they have some extra money to buy some snack or 
stationary they may need. What is more, having to decide how to spend 
money effectively a child learns about its value and grow to appreciate it. 
     Nevertheless, the opponents of this view claim that pocket money 
can do nothing but spoil offspring. They will buy unnecessary items such 
as sweets. Furthermore, there is a risk that they will get used to receiving 
an allowance and will take it for granted. 
     Although they may be partly right, I do not see any harm in providing 
children with small amount of money. Through practising to allocate, save 
it up and invest their allowance they will become sensible with money. 
     To sum up, I firmly believe that it is parent’s duty to help children to 
understand the meaning of money. There is no better way to do this than 
to let them be fully responsible for a small amount of money provided on 
a daily basis.


Career Choice vs Parents

Some people think that young people should follow in their
parents’ footsteps when choosing a profession.


      It is not a rare case when children are encouraged to choose the
profession their parents have. Moreover, many people believe that
this is the most favorable scenario for the young. However, the
opponents of this view claim that children benefit more when they are
free to make their own choice.
      In my opinion, parents should give their children a freedom of choice.
First of all, there is nothing worse in life than having to do a boring job
day by day. This usually happens when young people get misled by
the success of their parents and choose to take the same occupation
which actually does not coincide with their personal traits. Secondly,
the unconditional support of parents may make young specialists lazy
and ineffective. In other words they will take their promotions at work
for granted and will not have motivation for self-development.
      Nevertheless, some people share the view that parents may instill
their knowledge in children and therefore help them become an
excellent worker. In additional, few parents will refuse to make use of
their social network and help their beloved children to secure a good
job.
      Although it is tempting to choose the easiest way and follow your
parent’s footsteps, I think that it always pays off when we follow our
own dreams whatever efforts it takes . It would be a pity to realize
that our parent’s influence has prevented us from gaining selfsatisfaction.
      In conclusion, I maintain that under no condition should parents
impose their opinions on their children when it comes to their future
profession. Otherwise, it is possible that the young will blame their 
parents for choosing a wrong job.


EDU: making students love studying

Some people think that the most important thing for a teacher is
to make studying enjoyable for students.


     There is no doubt that the main teachers’ duty is to be very
knowledgeable about the subject matter. Nevertheless, some people
think that it is more important for a teacher to make their lessons
more enjoyable and fun for students.
     As for me, teachers should not forget about concernment of their
children. I think that being fascinating is much more important for
teacher. First of all, if students are interested in your subjects, they
will visit your lessons with excitement and pleasure. They will listen to
you very attentively and will not make such an awful noise. Secondly,
using creative and inspirational method of teaching, students will
understand the subject better. What is more, if a teacher knows how
to make his/her lessons more exciting, children will not be tired and
exhausted.
     However, some people are against such way of getting education.
They argue that a teacher should be the most intelligent; he should
know everything perfectly and never be mistaken. They also sure
that teacher cannot afford a joke during the lesson and he should be
always strict and severe.
     I completely disagree with this point of view. You can be the most
experienced teacher, knowing all rules perfectly, but if you do not
have a sense of humor and you are unable to make your students
interested in your subject, you are not a good teacher.
     Summing up, I strongly believe that interesting, exciting and creative
lessons are our future way of education. Teachers like that can be a 
good example for future generations.


воскресенье, 2 июня 2013 г.

Career: Following in one's Parents' Footsteps

Some people think that young people should follow in their
parents’ footsteps when choosing a profession.


     In today’s world education there is an essential thing you must have
to get a good job with a high salary and to occupy a high social
position in the society. Therefore, parents are worried about their
children’s choice. Do they have right in choosing child’s career? The
issue brings about many controversities.
     In my opinion, parent should value skills, abilities, personality. Firstly,
children need support and hint on the right way. There is only one
advice: to try to notice aptitudes for some subjects and to inspire in
juvenile a habit for work. Secondly, leaving school is the first stage of
social and psychological maturity. If parents think about all difficulties
in life without favour occupation, they will understand that job
satisfaction is the main life goal. Finally, the brain capacity is different
of each child. There is no confidence that young person will inherit
abilities of famous parents that is why complexes will appear.
      On the contrary, parent can influence the children’s doom. First of all,
parents are able to help with getting career qualification. One has a
counselor as loving and trusty person. Moreover, parents, whose
child follows in their footsteps are proud of them. Parents see not
many prospects of promotion but self-satisfaction and continuation
the career dynasty.
     In spite of these, I believe, there is the solution: to give one a better
start concerning personal preferences.
     In conclusion, I would kike to stress, managing and development a
career, at the first time, the choice of it depends on the children 
themselves.


суббота, 1 июня 2013 г.

Consumerism

There are lots of products on the market today. Is it reasonable?


     Nowadays market is stuffed with goods. Some people consider such
a variety of products to give a great opportunity to buy exactly what is
wanted. Others claim that a wide range of goods does not prove true
itself.
     In my view, mind-bending diversity of merchandise is not expedient.
To begin with, supply exceeds demand often. Unbought goods
become junk and they are often given away instead of recycling.
Furthermore, impelled by the desire to make a profit from mass
production entrepreneurs begin to economize on quality of the goods.
Consequently, much of production does not contribute to standards.
Besides, sometimes products of mass consumption are made from
ecologically unsafe materials. There are many cases when people
become ill after using these dangerous products.
     However, some people think, that an affluent assortment of goods is
very advantageous. Many people are in favour of choosing and
looking for the things seasoned exactly to their taste. Moreover,
developed trade industry provides many people with work. As a
result, trade industry is the most popular branch of industry today.
     Although, the true fact is that market is overcrowded with goods and
becomes unprofitable for both entrepreneurs and consumers alike.
Because of that, the reduction of goods on the market is inevitable.
     In conclusion, I strongly believe that superfluous production has no 
point because of its needlessness.


Prison

Some people are sure that sending to prison is the only way to
punish criminals. However, a lot of people believe there are far
more effective punishments for criminals than prison.


      Nowadays that punishment for offenders has become a very
controversial issue. Some people believe that imprisonment is a very
effectual solution to the problem, whereas others believe that that
there is a need to use another way to punish criminals. So where is
the truth?
      In my opinion, the prison is not the most preferred among different
ways to re-educate those who break the law. Firstly, imprisonment
can completely change a person but not necessarily for the better. A
prisoner has to live into close space, practically without contact with
the outside world that can cause serious mental disorders. Moreover,
there may be some difficulties in adaptation to normal life after leaving
prison. Secondly, offender’s surrounding will certainly affect any
person, who can adopt many negative habits from them, therefore
may be ready to commit a crime again. Finally, such a way of
punishment is often not right in different situations. For example, I
think that economic crimes do not deserve the same imprisonment
sentence as murders.
     Nevertheless, some people think that prisons help to keep society
safe from dangerous persons. They say that isolation gives criminals
time to speculate on their wrong deeds.
     This may be true, but I assume that those people have forgotten that
once an offender will be released from prison and possibly will
continue to make crimes because the situation and surrounding can
destroy his mind, so after prison, a man can be more dangerous than
before.
      In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that people should use other
methods to punish offenders. Prisons often do not fulfill their function 
to fix people and sometimes even harm a person`s identity.


Space Explorations VS Solving Problems on Earth

It's reported that billions of dollars are spent on space
exploration projects every year. Some people believe that this
money should be used to solve problems on Earth.

      Nowadays, people are trying to discover new stars, planets and
know more about the Galaxy. Lots of money are spent on it. Many
people think it is important to research space but others think that
mankind should spend more money on Earth's issues. Let us consider 
some pros and cons of it. 
      First and foremost, the result of space exploration can help us find 
out the origin of life on the Earth. Moreover, having explored space, 
people will be able to learn something new about outer-space's life. 
One must admit that such research have an influence on our life. For 
example, some research are useful in medicine. They are helpful in drug 
and medical technologies invention, which are used for treatment.
      On the other hand, there are a lot of problems on the Earth. Millions 
of people suffer from illnesses, poverty, starvetion. Day by day the level 
of water's and air's pollution increases. Doubtless, there is need in
money that helps us solve these disasters.
      In my opinion, solving of Earth's problems depends on progress
which we can make thanks to space exploration.
      To sum up, people should not forget that there is the big Universe 
whose mysteries ones can discover to make progress on the Earth.


Diets

Many people believe that the only way to lose weight is following
a special diet. However, doctors consider dieting harmful to our
health.

      Nowadays, people are thinking about their health more and more. 
And those people who is keeping fit are healthy. Some think that the best
way to improve their fit is the dieting. Others believe that a strict diet 
causes bad state of the health.
      In my opinion, dieting is a good way to lose weight. To begin with, 
following a diet helps to reduce the amount of food you eat, cut out 
snacks and desserts and consequently get rid obesity. Secondly, the 
diet may cut down on fat. Finally, you may plan quality of calories and
distribute food daily.
     On the other hand, there are those who think a strict diet may be 
dangerous. The lower the calories eaten per day , the harder it is to get 
the daily requirements of proteins and vitamins.Moreover, excessive 
dieting causes muscle loss and this loss may be from your heart with 
severe consequences. In addition, dieting lowers your metabolic rate, 
so when you return to your normal food intake, you will put on weight 
ever faster than before.
     Despite my respect to their opinion, I cannot share it. This all is 
insignificant when I am on my way of looking fabulous.
     In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that a well-balanced diet is the 
best way to keep fit. And it gives a body what it needs.


10 Фразовых глаголов о телефонном разговоре

СUT OFF - обрывать; прерывать.
Оperator, I have been cut off - (послушайте, оператор, нас разъединили)

GET THROUGH - связаться по телефону
I phoned you several times but couldn't get through (я звонил вам несколько раз, но никак не мог дозвониться)
Could you get through to him straight away?( не могли бы вы немедленно с ним связаться?)
Get me through to Paris at once (немедленно соедините меня с Парижем)

HANG ON - ждать (особ. у телефона) I'll hang on here until the others come. (Я подожду, пока другие придут.)

HANG UP - повесить телефонную трубку, дать отбой
Don't hang up (on me), I haven' t finished talking to you! (Не бросай трубку, я не закончила говорить с тобой!)

CALL BACK - перезвонить
I'll call you back as soon as possible.( Я перезвоню тебе как можно скорее.)

PICK UP - отвечать на (телефонный) звонок
I'm calling him, but he just isn't picking up! — (Звоню ему, звоню, а он просто трубку не берёт!)

PUT THROUGH - соединять (по телефону)
Can you put me through to this number? — (Можете соединить меня с этим номером?)

SPEAK UP - говорить громко и отчётливо
Speak up, we can't hear you. — (Пожалуйста, говорите громче, мы не слышим вас.)

BREAK UP - пропадать, прерываться (о радиосигнале)
You are breaking up. —( Ты пропадаешь). (т.е. тебя не слышно, так как связь прерывается; во время разговора по мобильному телефону)

HOLD ON - ждать у телефона




Learning Foreign Languages

Some people think that learning foreign languages is a waste of
time and money.


     In today`s world with the increasing globalization more and more
people are learning foreign languages. On this case some people assume 
that the knowing any foreign language plays a considerable role now. 
Whereas others believe that it is not worth studying it.
     In my opinion, a person should know some foreign languages. Firstly,
nowadays when global ties among countries are developing, one
should study a foreign language to obtain a well-paid, prestigious job.
Secondly, the knowing foreign languages is necessary while
travelling. And a person will not feel uncomfortable because of lack of
the language barrier.
    On the other hand, there are those who consider that a person does
not have to learn any foreign language. In their view, if you learn it, 
you waste of money. Moreover, studying a foreign language takes too 
much time.
    Nevertheless, I totally disagree with this a viewpoint, because there
are many sites in the Internet where you can acquire the knowledge
of a language. Also a person can study a language while getting to
work.
     In conclusion, I am strongly convinced that a person needs know 
foreign languages. It is a significant advantage for everyone.


ENV: Climate Change

Climate change is inevitable, it is not something we should panic
about.


      Nowadays a problem of changing climatic conditions, in particular,
global warming, is a very actual issue. Some people believe that there
is no reason to worry and we cannot stop this process, others have
much against. So where is the truth?
     In my opinion, every man should pay special attention to this serious
question. First of all, let me give an example, if climate on the Earth
changes, there will be mortality increase. Many diseases might be
caused by changing environmental state. Secondly, many kinds of
animals and plants will not acclimate to the new conditions and
therefore will also perish. It means that there will be reduced diversity
of terrestrial fauna. Finally, the majority of governments of different
countries will certainly have many difficulties, because they have to
work out a plan to solve economic, social and other problems, arising
from climate crisis.
     However, there are a lot of people think that global changing
environmental conditions do not depend on humanity and we should
not care about it. In addition, most of them think that climate change is
so far from today.
     I do not share this opinion as I am sure that human activities promote
global warming. For example, cars give off exhausts. Possibly,
people cannot stop climate change at all, but they should try to
mitigate effects of it for better life in future.
     To sum up, I am strongly convinced, that changing climate is a very
big and serious trouble for humanity. It is necessary for all of people 
to do everything possible to suspend the development of the problem.


пятница, 31 мая 2013 г.

EDU: Free Education or Paid One?

Should education be free?


      There are no doubts that good education is utterly important in the
contemporary world. In many countries people are obliged to pay if
they want to study and this is a norm of life. However, the opponents
of this system claim that the society is negatively affected by paid
education.
      Personally, I believe that both citizens and the government derive benefits
from free education. Firstly, this way the gap between the rich and the
poor is less yawning. All people, regardless of their social status and
income, should have a chance to study. Secondly, by providing
affordable education the government increases the overall intelligence
level in the country and reduces poverty. Finally, the more people are
qualified the better outlook for the future is in the global scale. The
work market is in need of enthusiastic and skillful employees who are
able to work hard for the sake of their own and the country’s
prosperity.
      Nevertheless, there is an opinion that paid education is more
effective. It is said that students treat studies more seriously when
they have to pay for it. Moreover, tuition fees enable colleges and
universities to buy expensive equipment essential for certain classes.
      Although they are partly right, I cannot help thinking about talented
poor students who cannot afford to study in a university. Their
intellectual capacity will be wasted on society and they are not going
to make a scientific breakthrough only because of a lack of money for
decent education.
      All things considered, I maintain that free education is not only
beneficial for people but also for the officials. Only intelligent and 
well-educated society is able to create a strong and developed state.


Cars Should be Banned

The car has become the most popular mean of transport in the
history of the world. However, some people say that the world
would be better without cars.


      There is no doubt that the invention of the car has changed the world
and nowadays we can hardly find a family without a car. Some people
claim that cars should be banned. In fact, there are too many cars in
our towns and cities which causes more pollution and more traffic
jams in rush hours. So, what is right in such situation?
      In my opinion, I do not mind reducing the number of cars. Without any
doubt, limited transport capacity contributes largely to the vexing
problems and people must definitely improve the situation. 
      As the matter of the fact, some people feel pessimistic about our
future with cars. They worry about pollution, poisoned air we breathe,
amount noise which are caused by cars, lack of space for green
gardens and playground.
     They are certainly right but only partly. I think our cars cannot be
banned at all. Also, using cars is very essential for people, as we can
get food using cars by delivering products to homes, business, work.
     In conclusion, I would like to say that everything is in our hands.
People can build efficient underground, tram service which will
certainly make our lives better and more comfortable. In addition,
environmentally friendly vehicles will reduce air pollution and
greenhouse gas emissions. They must be produced multitude and
sold in acceptable prices.